Alameda, CA vs Kaysville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Alameda
63.4
#1768 nationally
Kaysville
69.9
#1154 nationally
Alameda leads in walk score (68 vs 20). Kaysville leads in crime level (2.7 vs 8.7). Kaysville leads in cost of living index (123 vs 206).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Alameda, CA | Kaysville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.4 (#1768) | 69.9 (#1154) |
| Population | 75,353 | 32,941 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,156,096 | $693,528 |
| Median Household Income | $129,917 | $121,867 |
| Average Commute | 33.4 min | 23.6 min |
| Walk Score | 68 | 20 |
| Crime Level | 8.7 | 2.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 206 | 123 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+53.6 | R+24.9 |
D
63.4 Score
Alameda, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$1,156,096
Population
75,353
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
68
Pacific
View Alameda, CA →
D+
69.9 Score
Kaysville, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$693,528
Population
32,941
Crime
Low
Walk Score
20
West
View Kaysville, UT →