Amherst Town, MA vs Clinton, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Amherst Town
66
#305 nationally
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $68,427). Amherst Town leads in average commute (18.9 min vs 23.9 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Amherst Town, MA | Clinton, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66 (#305) | 72.7 (#840) |
| Population | 40,277 | 23,588 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $0 | $499,279 |
| Median Household Income | $68,427 | $102,712 |
| Average Commute | 18.9 min | 23.9 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 28 |
| Crime Level | N/A | 2.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | N/A | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+41.9 | R+24.9 |
—
Score
Amherst Town, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Population
40,277
Median Income
$68,427
Commute
18.9 min
Northeast
View Amherst Town, MA →
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Amherst Town for: