Ashland, OR vs Folsom, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Ashland
68.9
#1267 nationally
Folsom
67.8
#1378 nationally
Folsom leads in median household income ($134,935 vs $64,767). Ashland leads in walk score (55 vs 31). Ashland leads in average commute (16.3 min vs 26.1 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Ashland, OR | Folsom, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 68.9 (#1267) | 67.8 (#1378) |
| Population | 21,061 | 84,782 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $559,336 | $763,818 |
| Median Household Income | $64,767 | $134,935 |
| Average Commute | 16.3 min | 26.1 min |
| Walk Score | 55 | 31 |
| Crime Level | 6.9 | 5.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 140 | 165 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+6.4 | D+19.7 |
D+
68.9 Score
Ashland, OR
Small Oregon city with local appeal
Median Home
$559,336
Population
21,061
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
55
Pacific
View Ashland, OR →
D+
67.8 Score
Folsom, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$763,818
Population
84,782
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
31
Pacific
View Folsom, CA →