Avon, IN vs Clinton, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Avon
73.7
#681 nationally
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 3.7). Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 26.4 min). Avon leads in cost of living index (104 vs 114).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Avon, IN | Clinton, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.7 (#681) | 72.7 (#840) |
| Population | 24,231 | 23,588 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $359,850 | $499,279 |
| Median Household Income | $98,162 | $102,712 |
| Average Commute | 26.4 min | 23.9 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 28 |
| Crime Level | 3.7 | 2.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 104 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+21.5 | R+24.9 |
Data coverage note: Avon is missing data for 1 metric that Clinton has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
C
73.7 Score
Avon, IN
Small Indiana city with local appeal
Median Home
$359,850
Population
24,231
Crime
Low
Median Income
$98,162
Midwest
View Avon, IN →
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →