Bakersfield, CA vs Melbourne, FL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Bakersfield
66.5
#1531 nationally
Melbourne
69.9
#1158 nationally
Melbourne leads in crime level (7.6 vs 15.2). Bakersfield leads in median household income ($73,827 vs $60,917). Melbourne leads in cost of living index (105 vs 123).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | Melbourne, FL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.5 (#1531) | 69.9 (#1158) |
| Population | 413,381 | 86,960 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $391,030 | $360,012 |
| Median Household Income | $73,827 | $60,917 |
| Average Commute | 23.6 min | 22.5 min |
| Walk Score | 37 | 33 |
| Crime Level | 15.2 | 7.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 123 | 105 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+21.1 | R+20.8 |
D
66.5 Score
Bakersfield, CA
Growing California city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$391,030
Population
413,381
Crime
High
Walk Score
37
Pacific
View Bakersfield, CA →
D+
69.9 Score
Melbourne, FL
Florida community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$360,012
Population
86,960
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
33
Southeast
View Melbourne, FL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Bakersfield for: