Baldwin Park, CA vs Clinton, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Baldwin Park
62.1
#1872 nationally
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 11.1). Baldwin Park leads in walk score (55 vs 28). Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $76,002).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Baldwin Park, CA | Clinton, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.1 (#1872) | 72.7 (#840) |
| Population | 68,806 | 23,588 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $722,278 | $499,279 |
| Median Household Income | $76,002 | $102,712 |
| Average Commute | 30.5 min | 23.9 min |
| Walk Score | 55 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 11.1 | 2.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 145 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | R+24.9 |
D-
62.1 Score
Baldwin Park, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$722,278
Population
68,806
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
55
Pacific
View Baldwin Park, CA →
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Baldwin Park for: