Baldwin Park, CA vs Fulshear, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Baldwin Park
62.1
#1872 nationally
Fulshear
70.8
#1054 nationally
Fulshear leads in crime level (1.6 vs 11.1). Fulshear leads in median household income ($170,602 vs $76,002). Baldwin Park leads in average commute (30.5 min vs 39.4 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Baldwin Park, CA | Fulshear, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.1 (#1872) | 70.8 (#1054) |
| Population | 68,806 | 42,616 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $722,278 | $504,786 |
| Median Household Income | $76,002 | $170,602 |
| Average Commute | 30.5 min | 39.4 min |
| Walk Score | 55 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 11.1 | 1.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 145 | 144 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+1.6 |
Data coverage note: Fulshear is missing data for 1 metric that Baldwin Park has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D-
62.1 Score
Baldwin Park, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$722,278
Population
68,806
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
55
Pacific
View Baldwin Park, CA →
C-
70.8 Score
Fulshear, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$504,786
Population
42,616
Crime
Low
Median Income
$170,602
Southwest
View Fulshear, TX →
Try a different matchup
Swap Baldwin Park for: