Baldwin Park, CA vs Gardner, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Baldwin Park
62.1
#1872 nationally
Gardner
66.9
#1484 nationally
Baldwin Park leads in walk score (55 vs 39). Baldwin Park leads in median household income ($76,002 vs $56,974). Gardner leads in cost of living index (109 vs 145).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Baldwin Park, CA | Gardner, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.1 (#1872) | 66.9 (#1484) |
| Population | 68,806 | 20,974 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $722,278 | $379,602 |
| Median Household Income | $76,002 | $56,974 |
| Average Commute | 30.5 min | 31.7 min |
| Walk Score | 55 | 39 |
| Crime Level | 11.1 | 9.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 145 | 109 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+10.0 |
D-
62.1 Score
Baldwin Park, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$722,278
Population
68,806
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
55
Pacific
View Baldwin Park, CA →
D
66.9 Score
Gardner, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$379,602
Population
20,974
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
39
Northeast
View Gardner, MA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Baldwin Park for: