Baldwin Park, CA vs Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Baldwin Park
62.1
#1872 nationally
Pasadena
61.6
#1898 nationally
Baldwin Park leads in cost of living index (145 vs 197). Pasadena leads in median household income ($97,818 vs $76,002). Pasadena leads in walk score (69 vs 55).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Baldwin Park, CA | Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.1 (#1872) | 61.6 (#1898) |
| Population | 68,806 | 133,560 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $722,278 | $1,206,740 |
| Median Household Income | $76,002 | $97,818 |
| Average Commute | 30.5 min | 27.9 min |
| Walk Score | 55 | 69 |
| Crime Level | 11.1 | 13.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 145 | 197 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+32.9 |
D-
62.1 Score
Baldwin Park, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$722,278
Population
68,806
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
55
Pacific
View Baldwin Park, CA →
D-
61.6 Score
Pasadena, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,206,740
Population
133,560
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Baldwin Park for: