Baldwin Park, CA vs Pittsfield, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Baldwin Park
62.1
#1872 nationally
Pittsfield
72.6
#864 nationally
Pittsfield leads in average commute (17.8 min vs 30.5 min). Baldwin Park leads in walk score (55 vs 40). Pittsfield leads in cost of living index (107 vs 145).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Baldwin Park, CA | Pittsfield, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.1 (#1872) | 72.6 (#864) |
| Population | 68,806 | 43,076 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $722,278 | $313,325 |
| Median Household Income | $76,002 | $66,859 |
| Average Commute | 30.5 min | 17.8 min |
| Walk Score | 55 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 11.1 | 14.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 145 | 107 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+39.9 |
D-
62.1 Score
Baldwin Park, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$722,278
Population
68,806
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
55
Pacific
View Baldwin Park, CA →
C-
72.6 Score
Pittsfield, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$313,325
Population
43,076
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
40
Northeast
View Pittsfield, MA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Baldwin Park for: