Banning, CA vs Clinton, MS
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Banning
63.9
#1728 nationally
Clinton
79.4
#122 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (1.9 vs 12.8). Banning leads in walk score (29 vs 19). Clinton leads in median household income ($71,315 vs $54,083).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Banning, CA | Clinton, MS |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1728) | 79.4 (#122) |
| Population | 31,680 | 26,698 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $411,599 | $239,559 |
| Median Household Income | $54,083 | $71,315 |
| Average Commute | 28 min | 25.8 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 19 |
| Crime Level | 12.8 | 1.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 96 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | D+46.1 |
D
63.9 Score
Banning, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$411,599
Population
31,680
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Banning, CA →
C+
79.4 Score
Clinton, MS
Small Mississippi city with local appeal
Median Home
$239,559
Population
26,698
Crime
Low
Walk Score
19
Southeast
View Clinton, MS →