Banning, CA vs Cudahy, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Banning
63.9
#1728 nationally
Cudahy
59
#1951 nationally
Cudahy leads in walk score (62 vs 29). Banning leads in crime level (12.8 vs 17.9). Banning leads in cost of living index (118 vs 141).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Banning, CA | Cudahy, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1728) | 59 (#1951) |
| Population | 31,680 | 21,723 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $411,599 | $697,308 |
| Median Household Income | $54,083 | $49,596 |
| Average Commute | 28 min | 32.2 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 62 |
| Crime Level | 12.8 | 17.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 141 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | D+32.9 |
D
63.9 Score
Banning, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$411,599
Population
31,680
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Banning, CA →
F
59 Score
Cudahy, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$697,308
Population
21,723
Crime
High
Walk Score
62
Pacific
View Cudahy, CA →