Banning, CA vs Garner, NC
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Banning
63.9
#1728 nationally
Garner
68.5
#1312 nationally
Garner leads in median household income ($77,171 vs $54,083). Garner leads in crime level (9.8 vs 12.8). Banning leads in walk score (29 vs 23).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Banning, CA | Garner, NC |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1728) | 68.5 (#1312) |
| Population | 31,680 | 35,265 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $411,599 | $385,396 |
| Median Household Income | $54,083 | $77,171 |
| Average Commute | 28 min | 27.8 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 23 |
| Crime Level | 12.8 | 9.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 106 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | D+25.6 |
D
63.9 Score
Banning, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$411,599
Population
31,680
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Banning, CA →
D+
68.5 Score
Garner, NC
Small North Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$385,396
Population
35,265
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
23
Southeast
View Garner, NC →