Banning, CA vs Lauderdale Lakes, FL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Banning
63.9
#1728 nationally
Lauderdale Lakes
76.6
#333 nationally
Lauderdale Lakes leads in walk score (41 vs 29). Banning leads in median household income ($54,083 vs $41,644). Lauderdale Lakes leads in crime level (10.4 vs 12.8).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Banning, CA | Lauderdale Lakes, FL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1728) | 76.6 (#333) |
| Population | 31,680 | 36,035 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $411,599 | $138,348 |
| Median Household Income | $54,083 | $41,644 |
| Average Commute | 28 min | 28.1 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 12.8 | 10.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 98 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | D+17.0 |
D
63.9 Score
Banning, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$411,599
Population
31,680
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Banning, CA →
C
76.6 Score
Lauderdale Lakes, FL
Small Florida city with local appeal
Median Home
$138,348
Population
36,035
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
41
Southeast
View Lauderdale Lakes, FL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Banning for: