Banning, CA vs McKinney, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Banning
63.9
#1728 nationally
McKinney
73.5
#726 nationally
McKinney leads in median household income ($108,542 vs $54,083). Banning leads in walk score (29 vs 24). Banning leads in average commute (28 min vs 30.2 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Banning, CA | McKinney, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1728) | 73.5 (#726) |
| Population | 31,680 | 208,867 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $411,599 | $480,265 |
| Median Household Income | $54,083 | $108,542 |
| Average Commute | 28 min | 30.2 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 24 |
| Crime Level | 12.8 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 8.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | R+11.2 |
D
63.9 Score
Banning, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$411,599
Population
31,680
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Banning, CA →
C
73.5 Score
McKinney, TX
Historic downtown meets modern growth
Median Home
$480,265
Population
208,867
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Southwest
View McKinney, TX →