Bluffdale, UT vs Charleston, SC
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Bluffdale
67.4
#1423 nationally
Charleston
66
#1592 nationally
Bluffdale leads in median household income ($119,009 vs $76,819). Charleston leads in cost of living index (115 vs 141). Bluffdale leads in average commute (22.2 min vs 24.6 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Bluffdale, UT | Charleston, SC |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.4 (#1423) | 66 (#1592) |
| Population | 19,090 | 156,042 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $617,036 | $596,437 |
| Median Household Income | $119,009 | $76,819 |
| Average Commute | 22.2 min | 24.6 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 39 |
| Crime Level | 5.1 | Moderate |
| School Rating | N/A | 6.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 141 | 115 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+10.2 | D+5.7 |
Data coverage note: Bluffdale is missing data for 1 metric that Charleston has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D+
67.4 Score
Bluffdale, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$617,036
Population
19,090
Crime
Moderate-Low
Median Income
$119,009
West
View Bluffdale, UT →
D
66 Score
Charleston, SC
Southern charm meets coastal living
Median Home
$596,437
Population
156,042
Crime
Moderate
Schools
B
Southeast
View Charleston, SC →
Try a different matchup
Swap Bluffdale for: