Bluffdale, UT vs San Bruno, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Bluffdale
67.4
#1423 nationally
San Bruno
63.5
#1767 nationally
Bluffdale leads in cost of living index (141 vs 214). Bluffdale leads in crime level (5.1 vs 7.0). Bluffdale leads in average commute (22.2 min vs 26.3 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Bluffdale, UT | San Bruno, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.4 (#1423) | 63.5 (#1767) |
| Population | 19,090 | 41,327 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $617,036 | $1,308,809 |
| Median Household Income | $119,009 | $131,669 |
| Average Commute | 22.2 min | 26.3 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 56 |
| Crime Level | 5.1 | 7.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 141 | 214 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+10.2 | D+50.3 |
Data coverage note: Bluffdale is missing data for 1 metric that San Bruno has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D+
67.4 Score
Bluffdale, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$617,036
Population
19,090
Crime
Moderate-Low
Median Income
$119,009
West
View Bluffdale, UT →
D
63.5 Score
San Bruno, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,308,809
Population
41,327
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
56
Pacific
View San Bruno, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Bluffdale for: