Boston, MA vs Clinton, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Boston
66.2
#1568 nationally
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Boston leads in walk score (83 vs 28). Clinton leads in cost of living index (114 vs 155). Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 30.2 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Boston, MA | Clinton, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.2 (#1568) | 72.7 (#840) |
| Population | 684,379 | 23,588 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $787,763 | $499,279 |
| Median Household Income | $81,744 | $102,712 |
| Average Commute | 30.2 min | 23.9 min |
| Walk Score | 83 | 28 |
| Crime Level | Moderate | 2.4 |
| School Rating | 7.2 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 155 | 114 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+52.5 | R+24.9 |
D
66.2 Score
Boston, MA
Innovation hub with historic charm
Median Home
$787,763
Population
684,379
Crime
Moderate
Schools
B
Northeast
View Boston, MA →
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →