Burbank, CA vs Gardner, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Burbank
61.8
#1887 nationally
Gardner
66.9
#1484 nationally
Burbank leads in walk score (71 vs 39). Gardner leads in cost of living index (109 vs 191). Burbank leads in median household income ($91,455 vs $56,974).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Burbank, CA | Gardner, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.8 (#1887) | 66.9 (#1484) |
| Population | 102,755 | 20,974 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,191,810 | $379,602 |
| Median Household Income | $91,455 | $56,974 |
| Average Commute | 27.1 min | 31.7 min |
| Walk Score | 71 | 39 |
| Crime Level | 10.7 | 9.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 191 | 109 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+10.0 |
D-
61.8 Score
Burbank, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,191,810
Population
102,755
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
71
Pacific
View Burbank, CA →
D
66.9 Score
Gardner, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$379,602
Population
20,974
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
39
Northeast
View Gardner, MA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Burbank for: