Burbank, IL vs Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Burbank
75.4
#459 nationally
Cuyahoga Falls
82.2
#31 nationally
Cuyahoga Falls leads in average commute (22.2 min vs 33.2 min). Burbank leads in walk score (59 vs 46). Burbank leads in median household income ($81,060 vs $67,922).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Burbank, IL | Cuyahoga Falls, OH |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 75.4 (#459) | 82.2 (#31) |
| Population | 28,164 | 50,742 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $316,257 | $220,712 |
| Median Household Income | $81,060 | $67,922 |
| Average Commute | 33.2 min | 22.2 min |
| Walk Score | 59 | 46 |
| Crime Level | 5.4 | 4.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 105 | 91 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+42.0 | D+7.0 |
C
75.4 Score
Burbank, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$316,257
Population
28,164
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
59
Midwest
View Burbank, IL →
B-
82.2 Score
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Ohio community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$220,712
Population
50,742
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
46
Midwest
View Cuyahoga Falls, OH →
Try a different matchup
Swap Burbank for:
Swap Cuyahoga Falls for: