Burlingame, CA vs Taylorsville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Burlingame
66.4
#1542 nationally
Taylorsville
68.6
#1308 nationally
Burlingame leads in median household income ($165,940 vs $81,417). Burlingame leads in walk score (70 vs 35). Taylorsville leads in average commute (21.6 min vs 31.5 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Burlingame, CA | Taylorsville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.4 (#1542) | 68.6 (#1308) |
| Population | 29,910 | 57,098 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $2,817,833 | $499,374 |
| Median Household Income | $165,940 | $81,417 |
| Average Commute | 31.5 min | 21.6 min |
| Walk Score | 70 | 35 |
| Crime Level | 5.0 | 6.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | N/A | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+50.3 | D+10.2 |
D
66.4 Score
Burlingame, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$2,817,833
Population
29,910
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
70
Pacific
View Burlingame, CA →
D+
68.6 Score
Taylorsville, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$499,374
Population
57,098
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
35
West
View Taylorsville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Burlingame for: