Camas, WA vs McKinney, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Camas
70.5
#1091 nationally
McKinney
73.5
#726 nationally
McKinney leads in walk score (24 vs 18). McKinney leads in cost of living index (111 vs 140). Camas leads in median household income ($133,829 vs $108,542).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Camas, WA | McKinney, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 70.5 (#1091) | 73.5 (#726) |
| Population | 27,254 | 208,867 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $750,827 | $480,265 |
| Median Household Income | $133,829 | $108,542 |
| Average Commute | 27 min | 30.2 min |
| Walk Score | 18 | 24 |
| Crime Level | 1.3 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 8.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 140 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+7.0 | R+11.2 |
C-
70.5 Score
Camas, WA
Small Washington city with local appeal
Median Home
$750,827
Population
27,254
Crime
Very Low
Walk Score
18
Pacific
View Camas, WA →
C
73.5 Score
McKinney, TX
Historic downtown meets modern growth
Median Home
$480,265
Population
208,867
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Southwest
View McKinney, TX →