Cambridge, MA vs Holladay, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Cambridge
70.6
#1085 nationally
Holladay
69.6
#1185 nationally
Cambridge leads in walk score (87 vs 36). Holladay leads in average commute (19.4 min vs 27.8 min). Holladay leads in cost of living index (139 vs 172).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Cambridge, MA | Holladay, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 70.6 (#1085) | 69.6 (#1185) |
| Population | 117,090 | 30,298 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,055,780 | $851,133 |
| Median Household Income | $115,892 | $106,099 |
| Average Commute | 27.8 min | 19.4 min |
| Walk Score | 87 | 36 |
| Crime Level | Low | 2.7 |
| School Rating | 8.4 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 172 | 139 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+39.5 | D+10.2 |
C-
70.6 Score
Cambridge, MA
Academic powerhouse across the Charles
Median Home
$1,055,780
Population
117,090
Crime
Low
Schools
A
Northeast
View Cambridge, MA →
D+
69.6 Score
Holladay, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$851,133
Population
30,298
Crime
Low
Walk Score
36
West
View Holladay, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Cambridge for: