Carrboro, NC vs South Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Carrboro
70.3
#1110 nationally
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
South Pasadena leads in walk score (67 vs 29). Carrboro leads in cost of living index (126 vs 228). South Pasadena leads in median household income ($127,882 vs $76,933).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Carrboro, NC | South Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 70.3 (#1110) | 63.6 (#1760) |
| Population | 21,103 | 25,623 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $429,889 | $1,707,701 |
| Median Household Income | $76,933 | $127,882 |
| Average Commute | 23.5 min | 30.6 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 67 |
| Crime Level | 4.9 | 5.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 126 | 228 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+51.1 | D+32.9 |
C-
70.3 Score
Carrboro, NC
Small North Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$429,889
Population
21,103
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
29
Southeast
View Carrboro, NC →
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Carrboro for: