Champaign, IL vs Taylorsville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Champaign
77.8
#214 nationally
Taylorsville
68.6
#1308 nationally
Taylorsville leads in crime level (6.3 vs 13.7). Champaign leads in walk score (52 vs 35). Champaign leads in average commute (14.8 min vs 21.6 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Champaign, IL | Taylorsville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 77.8 (#214) | 68.6 (#1308) |
| Population | 89,189 | 57,098 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $240,516 | $499,374 |
| Median Household Income | $58,273 | $81,417 |
| Average Commute | 14.8 min | 21.6 min |
| Walk Score | 52 | 35 |
| Crime Level | 13.7 | 6.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 98 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+24.1 | D+10.2 |
C+
77.8 Score
Champaign, IL
Illinois community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$240,516
Population
89,189
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
52
Midwest
View Champaign, IL →
D+
68.6 Score
Taylorsville, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$499,374
Population
57,098
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
35
West
View Taylorsville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Champaign for: