Chelsea, MA vs Kaysville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Chelsea
62.7
#1829 nationally
Kaysville
69.9
#1154 nationally
Kaysville leads in crime level (2.7 vs 26.8). Chelsea leads in walk score (81 vs 20). Kaysville leads in median household income ($121,867 vs $71,051).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Chelsea, MA | Kaysville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.7 (#1829) | 69.9 (#1154) |
| Population | 38,319 | 32,941 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $531,983 | $693,528 |
| Median Household Income | $71,051 | $121,867 |
| Average Commute | 34.1 min | 23.6 min |
| Walk Score | 81 | 20 |
| Crime Level | 26.8 | 2.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 135 | 123 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+52.5 | R+24.9 |
D-
62.7 Score
Chelsea, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$531,983
Population
38,319
Crime
Very High
Walk Score
81
Northeast
View Chelsea, MA →
D+
69.9 Score
Kaysville, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$693,528
Population
32,941
Crime
Low
Walk Score
20
West
View Kaysville, UT →