Chino Hills, CA vs Elmwood Park, NJ
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Chino Hills
62.7
#1830 nationally
Elmwood Park
62
#1879 nationally
Elmwood Park leads in walk score (56 vs 23). Chino Hills leads in crime level (3.8 vs 6.1). Elmwood Park leads in average commute (25.7 min vs 37.5 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Chino Hills, CA | Elmwood Park, NJ |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.7 (#1830) | 62 (#1879) |
| Population | 77,212 | 21,256 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $985,223 | $628,943 |
| Median Household Income | $117,548 | $84,578 |
| Average Commute | 37.5 min | 25.7 min |
| Walk Score | 23 | 56 |
| Crime Level | 3.8 | 6.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 177 | 136 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+2.1 | D+3.4 |
Data coverage note: Elmwood Park is missing data for 1 metric that Chino Hills has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D-
62.7 Score
Chino Hills, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$985,223
Population
77,212
Crime
Low
Walk Score
23
Pacific
View Chino Hills, CA →
D-
62 Score
Elmwood Park, NJ
Small New Jersey city with local appeal
Median Home
$628,943
Population
21,256
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
56
Northeast
View Elmwood Park, NJ →
Try a different matchup
Swap Chino Hills for: