Chino Hills, CA vs Taylorsville, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Chino Hills
62.7
#1830 nationally
Taylorsville
68.6
#1308 nationally
Taylorsville leads in average commute (21.6 min vs 37.5 min). Chino Hills leads in crime level (3.8 vs 6.3). Taylorsville leads in cost of living index (111 vs 177).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Chino Hills, CA | Taylorsville, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.7 (#1830) | 68.6 (#1308) |
| Population | 77,212 | 57,098 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $985,223 | $499,374 |
| Median Household Income | $117,548 | $81,417 |
| Average Commute | 37.5 min | 21.6 min |
| Walk Score | 23 | 35 |
| Crime Level | 3.8 | 6.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 177 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+2.1 | D+10.2 |
D-
62.7 Score
Chino Hills, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$985,223
Population
77,212
Crime
Low
Walk Score
23
Pacific
View Chino Hills, CA →
D+
68.6 Score
Taylorsville, UT
Utah community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$499,374
Population
57,098
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
35
West
View Taylorsville, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Chino Hills for: