Claremont, CA vs McKinney, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Claremont
61.8
#1888 nationally
McKinney
73.5
#726 nationally
Claremont leads in walk score (48 vs 24). McKinney leads in cost of living index (111 vs 173). Claremont leads in average commute (27.5 min vs 30.2 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Claremont, CA | McKinney, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.8 (#1888) | 73.5 (#726) |
| Population | 35,640 | 208,867 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,037,849 | $480,265 |
| Median Household Income | $115,091 | $108,542 |
| Average Commute | 27.5 min | 30.2 min |
| Walk Score | 48 | 24 |
| Crime Level | 13.7 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 8.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 173 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | R+11.2 |
D-
61.8 Score
Claremont, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,037,849
Population
35,640
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
48
Pacific
View Claremont, CA →
C
73.5 Score
McKinney, TX
Historic downtown meets modern growth
Median Home
$480,265
Population
208,867
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Southwest
View McKinney, TX →