Clinton, UT vs Fort Mill, SC
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Fort Mill
72.6
#858 nationally
Fort Mill leads in crime level (1.3 vs 2.4). Fort Mill leads in median household income ($128,125 vs $102,712). Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 27 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Fort Mill, SC |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 72.6 (#858) |
| Population | 23,588 | 33,626 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $529,805 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $128,125 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 27 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 1.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 115 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | R+19.1 |
Data coverage note: Fort Mill is missing data for 1 metric that Clinton has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
C-
72.6 Score
Fort Mill, SC
Small South Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$529,805
Population
33,626
Crime
Very Low
Median Income
$128,125
Southeast
View Fort Mill, SC →