Clinton, UT vs Framingham, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Framingham
64.6
#1685 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 8.9). Framingham leads in walk score (42 vs 28). Clinton leads in cost of living index (114 vs 145).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Framingham, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 64.6 (#1685) |
| Population | 23,588 | 71,875 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $671,985 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $94,909 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 30.3 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 42 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 8.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 145 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | D+39.5 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
D
64.6 Score
Framingham, MA
Massachusetts community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$671,985
Population
71,875
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
42
Northeast
View Framingham, MA →