Clinton, UT vs Kingman, AZ
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Kingman
73.6
#703 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 6.1). Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $56,360). Kingman leads in average commute (18.2 min vs 23.9 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Kingman, AZ |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 73.6 (#703) |
| Population | 23,588 | 35,334 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $275,989 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $56,360 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 18.2 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 25 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 6.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 99 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | R+55.8 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
C
73.6 Score
Kingman, AZ
Small Arizona city with local appeal
Median Home
$275,989
Population
35,334
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
25
Southwest
View Kingman, AZ →