Clinton, UT vs Lafayette, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Lafayette
62.7
#1832 nationally
Clinton leads in cost of living index (114 vs 280). Lafayette leads in median household income ($219,250 vs $102,712). Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 29.7 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Lafayette, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 62.7 (#1832) |
| Population | 23,588 | 25,048 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $1,941,109 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $219,250 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 29.7 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 26 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 2.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 280 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | D+38.0 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
D-
62.7 Score
Lafayette, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,941,109
Population
25,048
Crime
Low
Walk Score
26
Pacific
View Lafayette, CA →