Clinton, UT vs Mokena, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Mokena
72.8
#832 nationally
Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 31.7 min). Clinton leads in walk score (28 vs 23). Mokena leads in median household income ($122,235 vs $102,712).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Mokena, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 72.8 (#832) |
| Population | 23,588 | 19,759 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $461,660 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $122,235 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 31.7 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 23 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 2.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 118 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | D+1.6 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
C-
72.8 Score
Mokena, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$461,660
Population
19,759
Crime
Low
Walk Score
23
Midwest
View Mokena, IL →