Clinton, UT vs Oakland, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Oakland
62
#1880 nationally
Oakland leads in walk score (73 vs 28). Clinton leads in cost of living index (114 vs 155). Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 32.1 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Oakland, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 62 (#1880) |
| Population | 23,588 | 433,823 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $717,798 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $85,459 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 32.1 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 73 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | High |
| School Rating | N/A | 4.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 155 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | D+53.6 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
D-
62 Score
Oakland, CA
Gritty, diverse, and full of culture
Median Home
$717,798
Population
433,823
Crime
High
Schools
C
Pacific
View Oakland, CA →