Clinton, UT vs Pinellas Park, FL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Pinellas Park
72.9
#813 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 6.4). Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $62,306). Pinellas Park leads in walk score (40 vs 28).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Pinellas Park, FL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 72.9 (#813) |
| Population | 23,588 | 53,456 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $305,323 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $62,306 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 23 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 6.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 104 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | R+5.2 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
C-
72.9 Score
Pinellas Park, FL
Florida community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$305,323
Population
53,456
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
40
Southeast
View Pinellas Park, FL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Clinton for: