Clinton, UT vs Sweetwater, FL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Sweetwater
65.9
#1603 nationally
Clinton leads in median household income ($102,712 vs $53,159). Clinton leads in average commute (23.9 min vs 27.9 min). Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 2.8).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Sweetwater, FL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 65.9 (#1603) |
| Population | 23,588 | 20,352 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $448,534 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $53,159 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 27.9 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 2.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 107 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | R+11.4 |
Data coverage note: Sweetwater is missing data for 1 metric that Clinton has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
D
65.9 Score
Sweetwater, FL
Small Florida city with local appeal
Median Home
$448,534
Population
20,352
Crime
Low
Median Income
$53,159
Southeast
View Sweetwater, FL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Clinton for: