Clinton, UT vs Washington, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clinton
72.7
#840 nationally
Washington
70.3
#1120 nationally
Clinton leads in walk score (28 vs 15). Clinton leads in crime level (2.4 vs 4.1). Washington leads in average commute (15.4 min vs 23.9 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clinton, UT | Washington, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.7 (#840) | 70.3 (#1120) |
| Population | 23,588 | 33,877 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $499,279 | $543,808 |
| Median Household Income | $102,712 | $94,655 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 15.4 min |
| Walk Score | 28 | 15 |
| Crime Level | 2.4 | 4.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 122 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | R+52.3 |
C-
72.7 Score
Clinton, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$499,279
Population
23,588
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
West
View Clinton, UT →
C-
70.3 Score
Washington, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$543,808
Population
33,877
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
15
West
View Washington, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Clinton for: