Corona, CA vs Garland, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Corona
62.4
#1857 nationally
Garland
73.2
#772 nationally
Garland leads in cost of living index (102 vs 154). Corona leads in median household income ($103,727 vs $71,044). Garland leads in average commute (29.7 min vs 35.3 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Corona, CA | Garland, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.4 (#1857) | 73.2 (#772) |
| Population | 160,238 | 243,470 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $762,969 | $287,246 |
| Median Household Income | $103,727 | $71,044 |
| Average Commute | 35.3 min | 29.7 min |
| Walk Score | 39 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 6.8 | 6.4 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 154 | 102 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | D+22.2 |
D-
62.4 Score
Corona, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$762,969
Population
160,238
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
39
Pacific
View Corona, CA →
C
73.2 Score
Garland, TX
Growing Texas city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$287,246
Population
243,470
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
40
Southwest
View Garland, TX →