Corona, CA vs McKinney, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Corona
62.4
#1857 nationally
McKinney
73.5
#726 nationally
Corona leads in walk score (39 vs 24). McKinney leads in cost of living index (111 vs 154). McKinney leads in average commute (30.2 min vs 35.3 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Corona, CA | McKinney, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.4 (#1857) | 73.5 (#726) |
| Population | 160,238 | 208,867 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $762,969 | $480,265 |
| Median Household Income | $103,727 | $108,542 |
| Average Commute | 35.3 min | 30.2 min |
| Walk Score | 39 | 24 |
| Crime Level | 6.8 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 8.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 154 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | R+11.2 |
D-
62.4 Score
Corona, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$762,969
Population
160,238
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
39
Pacific
View Corona, CA →
C
73.5 Score
McKinney, TX
Historic downtown meets modern growth
Median Home
$480,265
Population
208,867
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Southwest
View McKinney, TX →