Cranston, RI vs Grayslake, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Cranston
73.9
#656 nationally
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Cranston leads in walk score (51 vs 28). Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 2.5). Grayslake leads in median household income ($110,662 vs $83,123).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Cranston, RI | Grayslake, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.9 (#656) | 76.3 (#362) |
| Population | 82,635 | 20,954 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $461,969 | $374,561 |
| Median Household Income | $83,123 | $110,662 |
| Average Commute | 23.9 min | 28.7 min |
| Walk Score | 51 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 2.5 | 1.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 114 | 108 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+14.4 | D+20.8 |
C
73.9 Score
Cranston, RI
Rhode Island community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$461,969
Population
82,635
Crime
Low
Walk Score
51
Northeast
View Cranston, RI →
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Cranston for: