Crystal, MN vs Easley, SC
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Crystal
75
#509 nationally
Easley
69.5
#1195 nationally
Crystal leads in walk score (44 vs 24). Crystal leads in median household income ($86,288 vs $62,551). Easley leads in crime level (6.5 vs 7.7).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Crystal, MN | Easley, SC |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 75 (#509) | 69.5 (#1195) |
| Population | 21,906 | 26,386 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $323,618 | $323,732 |
| Median Household Income | $86,288 | $62,551 |
| Average Commute | 24 min | 27.6 min |
| Walk Score | 44 | 24 |
| Crime Level | 7.7 | 6.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 105 | 97 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+42.6 | R+52.7 |
C
75 Score
Crystal, MN
Small Minnesota city with local appeal
Median Home
$323,618
Population
21,906
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
44
Midwest
View Crystal, MN →
D+
69.5 Score
Easley, SC
Small South Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$323,732
Population
26,386
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
24
Southeast
View Easley, SC →