Cudahy, CA vs Murfreesboro, TN
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Cudahy
59
#1951 nationally
Murfreesboro
65
#1659 nationally
Cudahy leads in walk score (62 vs 25). Murfreesboro leads in crime level (11.5 vs 17.9). Murfreesboro leads in median household income ($70,451 vs $49,596).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Cudahy, CA | Murfreesboro, TN |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 59 (#1951) | 65 (#1659) |
| Population | 21,723 | 165,430 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $697,308 | $430,142 |
| Median Household Income | $49,596 | $70,451 |
| Average Commute | 32.2 min | 27.3 min |
| Walk Score | 62 | 25 |
| Crime Level | 17.9 | 11.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 141 | 109 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | R+21.8 |
F
59 Score
Cudahy, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$697,308
Population
21,723
Crime
High
Walk Score
62
Pacific
View Cudahy, CA →
D
65 Score
Murfreesboro, TN
Mid-size Tennessee city with community character
Median Home
$430,142
Population
165,430
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
25
Southeast
View Murfreesboro, TN →
Try a different matchup
Swap Cudahy for: