Cudahy, CA vs Pittsfield, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Cudahy
59
#1951 nationally
Pittsfield
72.6
#864 nationally
Pittsfield leads in average commute (17.8 min vs 32.2 min). Cudahy leads in walk score (62 vs 40). Pittsfield leads in median household income ($66,859 vs $49,596).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Cudahy, CA | Pittsfield, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 59 (#1951) | 72.6 (#864) |
| Population | 21,723 | 43,076 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $697,308 | $313,325 |
| Median Household Income | $49,596 | $66,859 |
| Average Commute | 32.2 min | 17.8 min |
| Walk Score | 62 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 17.9 | 14.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 141 | 107 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+39.9 |
F
59 Score
Cudahy, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$697,308
Population
21,723
Crime
High
Walk Score
62
Pacific
View Cudahy, CA →
C-
72.6 Score
Pittsfield, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$313,325
Population
43,076
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
40
Northeast
View Pittsfield, MA →