Culver City, CA vs Irvine, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Culver City
60.8
#1921 nationally
Irvine
67.2
#1452 nationally
Culver City leads in walk score (76 vs 44). Irvine leads in cost of living index (178 vs 208). Irvine leads in average commute (25.8 min vs 27.4 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Culver City, CA | Irvine, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 60.8 (#1921) | 67.2 (#1452) |
| Population | 39,041 | 307,670 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,287,430 | $1,517,431 |
| Median Household Income | $114,429 | $116,519 |
| Average Commute | 27.4 min | 25.8 min |
| Walk Score | 76 | 44 |
| Crime Level | 18.3 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 9.5 |
| Cost of Living Index | 208 | 178 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+2.6 |
D-
60.8 Score
Culver City, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,287,430
Population
39,041
Crime
High
Walk Score
76
Pacific
View Culver City, CA →
D+
67.2 Score
Irvine, CA
Master-planned perfection in Southern California
Median Home
$1,517,431
Population
307,670
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Pacific
View Irvine, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Culver City for: