Culver City, CA vs Lindenwold, NJ
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Culver City
60.8
#1921 nationally
Lindenwold
70
#1144 nationally
Culver City leads in median household income ($114,429 vs $53,645). Lindenwold leads in cost of living index (102 vs 208). Culver City leads in walk score (76 vs 40).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Culver City, CA | Lindenwold, NJ |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 60.8 (#1921) | 70 (#1144) |
| Population | 39,041 | 21,685 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,287,430 | $276,054 |
| Median Household Income | $114,429 | $53,645 |
| Average Commute | 27.4 min | 28.3 min |
| Walk Score | 76 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 18.3 | 11.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 208 | 102 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+27.4 |
D-
60.8 Score
Culver City, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,287,430
Population
39,041
Crime
High
Walk Score
76
Pacific
View Culver City, CA →
C-
70 Score
Lindenwold, NJ
Small New Jersey city with local appeal
Median Home
$276,054
Population
21,685
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
40
Northeast
View Lindenwold, NJ →
Try a different matchup
Swap Culver City for: