Cuyahoga Falls, OH vs Lancaster, PA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Cuyahoga Falls
82.2
#31 nationally
Lancaster
63.7
#413 nationally
Cuyahoga Falls leads in crime level (4.8 vs 9.5). Lancaster leads in walk score (81 vs 46). Cuyahoga Falls leads in median household income ($67,922 vs $61,014).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Cuyahoga Falls, OH | Lancaster, PA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 82.2 (#31) | 63.7 (#413) |
| Population | 50,742 | 57,153 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $220,712 | $0 |
| Median Household Income | $67,922 | $61,014 |
| Average Commute | 22.2 min | 23 min |
| Walk Score | 46 | 81 |
| Crime Level | 4.8 | 9.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 91 | 93 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+7.0 | R+15.9 |
B-
82.2 Score
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Ohio community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$220,712
Population
50,742
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
46
Midwest
View Cuyahoga Falls, OH →
—
Score
Lancaster, PA
Pennsylvania community balancing growth and livability
Population
57,153
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
81
Median Income
$61,014
Northeast
View Lancaster, PA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Cuyahoga Falls for: