Cuyahoga Falls, OH vs Pittsfield, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Cuyahoga Falls
82.2
#31 nationally
Pittsfield
72.6
#864 nationally
Cuyahoga Falls leads in crime level (4.8 vs 14.0). Pittsfield leads in average commute (17.8 min vs 22.2 min). Cuyahoga Falls leads in cost of living index (91 vs 107).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Cuyahoga Falls, OH | Pittsfield, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 82.2 (#31) | 72.6 (#864) |
| Population | 50,742 | 43,076 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $220,712 | $313,325 |
| Median Household Income | $67,922 | $66,859 |
| Average Commute | 22.2 min | 17.8 min |
| Walk Score | 46 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 4.8 | 14.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 91 | 107 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+7.0 | D+39.9 |
B-
82.2 Score
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Ohio community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$220,712
Population
50,742
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
46
Midwest
View Cuyahoga Falls, OH →
C-
72.6 Score
Pittsfield, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$313,325
Population
43,076
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
40
Northeast
View Pittsfield, MA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Cuyahoga Falls for: