Fairborn, OH vs Grayslake, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fairborn
78.2
#189 nationally
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 7.5). Grayslake leads in median household income ($110,662 vs $53,783). Fairborn leads in average commute (20.6 min vs 28.7 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fairborn, OH | Grayslake, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 78.2 (#189) | 76.3 (#362) |
| Population | 34,729 | 20,954 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $210,326 | $374,561 |
| Median Household Income | $53,783 | $110,662 |
| Average Commute | 20.6 min | 28.7 min |
| Walk Score | 32 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 7.5 | 1.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 89 | 108 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+19.8 | D+20.8 |
C+
78.2 Score
Fairborn, OH
Small Ohio city with local appeal
Median Home
$210,326
Population
34,729
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
32
Midwest
View Fairborn, OH →
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fairborn for: