Fairfield, CA vs Fishers, IN
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fairfield
62.9
#1812 nationally
Fishers
76.4
#349 nationally
Fairfield leads in walk score (37 vs 22). Fishers leads in cost of living index (101 vs 151). Fishers leads in average commute (24.8 min vs 32.3 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fairfield, CA | Fishers, IN |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.9 (#1812) | 76.4 (#349) |
| Population | 120,768 | 103,842 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $605,863 | $449,366 |
| Median Household Income | $98,857 | $115,126 |
| Average Commute | 32.3 min | 24.8 min |
| Walk Score | 37 | 22 |
| Crime Level | 13.6 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 8.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 151 | 101 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+23.0 | R+6.1 |
D-
62.9 Score
Fairfield, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$605,863
Population
120,768
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
37
Pacific
View Fairfield, CA →
C
76.4 Score
Fishers, IN
Young families find their perfect fit
Median Home
$449,366
Population
103,842
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Midwest
View Fishers, IN →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fairfield for: